Archive
Daily Archives: November 20, 2012
Daily Archives: November 20, 2012
A few posts back, I mentioned ever-useful the McGuffin plot. If you pay close attention, you will often see Hollywood writers wink slyly at the viewers in the know by mentioning the McGuffin right in the script. It’s a meta-McGuffin!
Here’s one McGuffin I recently found in the wild on The Penguins of Madagascar (Season 2, It’s About Time):
Kowalski: (Sighs) Oh Skipper, I don’t think you’re seeing the big picture here. With the Chronotron we’ll be able to visit any period in history!
After taking a sip, Skipper throws his cup of joe to the side, and punches his open hand while talking.Skipper: Outstanding! Finally those hippies can be stopped! C’mon Rico!
Skipper and Rico slowly advance towards the Chrono-tron.Rico: (Angrily) Hippies!Kowalski: Hold on Skipper, the Chronotron needs just one more thing before it’s fully functional. Five ounces of Macguffium-239. Fortunately I know where to find some right here in midtown.Kowalski pulls out a City Map and points to the center of it.
Nathan Bransford wrote a controversial post in which he defended, not the content but the prose of 50 Shades of Grey. (Honestly, I don’t think anyone needs to defend the content either. Sexist? Sure; also the plot of pretty much every erotica novel ever. And since these are books by women for women there’s something else going on besides anti-feminism.) But let’s say that you loathe the content, does it follow the writing itself is also pure trash:
Nathan Bransford, Author: What People Talk About When They Talk About Bad Wr…: One thing about my Fifty Shades of Grey post that inspired some mild controversy was my insistence that it’s not that badly written.
What’s interesting about talking about “good” writing and “bad” writing is that when people use those terms, different people often mean different things.
When I talk about “good” writing and “bad” writing, I mean the prose. Is it readable on a sentence-to-sentence level? Is there a flow? Is there a voice? Do I get tripped up by a lack of specificity in description or are the details evocative? Is the hand of the author too apparent or am I able to lose myself in the world of the book?
This is all mainly accomplished on the sentence level. It’s not about character or plot or plausibility or whether the book is compelling or not and not at all about whether I like the book, it’s whether the author can write a paragraph….
Well, I completely agree with him, and I see this error in logic all the time. The error looks like this:
1. The content is bad / stupid / morally repulsive
THEREFORE:
2. The prose is awful.
Oh, friends. That’s Cartoon Logic. That’s like saying that you can tell a Villain by what color spandex he wears.
This is a really important point for self-published authors to learn too, because I see so many self-published books with the opposite problem. The content is original and fun and interesting but the prose is ghastly. If you try to point this out, you receive a rant about the conspiracy of Big Six publishers to squash new ideas. It isn’t Big Six publishers…It’s dangling prepositions and unclear antecedents. A book can shoot to the top of the charts with a hackneyed plot but not with a lack of periods at the end of sentences.
–>
If you prefer these Tips as an ebook you can buy it here for $0.99:
Control the length of your writing, or this could happen to you. |
It’s ironic. I wrote my Tips ahead of time. The order of writing tips is an not exact science (which is why I’m offering them as a complete ebook for those who want to “cheat” and read ahead.) As it happens, however, when I woke up this morning I was worried about two things, (A) how to cook a turkey, and (B) that my NaNo novel was going to be too long.
Also, I think I’m going to put the shoe scene back in. (A decision not unrelated to the wordcount worries.)
I’m still wavering between a three act structure (with 15 chapters) or a four act structure (with 12 chapters). The 12 chapters don’t seem to be working, but I’m attached to it because I like the number twelve for this series.
I told myself when I started this book that I wasn’t going to obsess about either (A) the number of chapters or (B) the length of the chapter. I would let the words and chapters flow as they willed.
Hahahahaaha.
Many writers write that way, but me: I obsess. You might think, well, if Chapter 3 is too long and Chapter 4 is too short, just move some of the stuff from 3 into 4. How hard, Tara, seriously? But nooooooo. I can’t. Because I write each chapter as its own mini-story, with certain things that MUST happen in that chapter, a specific beginning and a specific end, and I can’t simply take the Ironic Ending of Chapter 3, which references the Hook at the beginning of 3, and put it in Chapter 4.
There’s another reason too. I’ve found that, as agonizing and frustrating as it is to fit the story into X chapters of Y words each with a novel no longer than Z…. It usually forces me to improve the novel. When there’s flab that doesn’t fit, there are two possible problems. One, the flab is fat and must be cut. Or two, there is more meat the the material than I considered in my original Outline.
Examples:
Cut? There are a couple of characters I wonder if I need to cut, for instance, his two junkie friends. They have purpose–they betray him to his stepfather. Hm. So I won’t cut them, but maybe I can still cut down the scene they are in, or move it so that these friends are not as prominent.
Add? I read over my first Act and, although I liked a lot of it, I felt that it wasn’t “Halloweeny” enough. I already have ghosts, demons, masks, ritual murder, a witch with a cute kitten familiar, a geometry quiz, houses with decorated with lawn cemeteries, satanic schemes, a trip to hell and Trick Or Treating which will include an army of ravaging goblin teenagers. Hm. What major component of Halloween was still missing? Ah! Candy. Duh!