- by Tara Maya
NaNoWriMo Tip #30: Wrapping Up and Revision
NaNoWriMo Tip #29: Seven Questions to Ask About Your Manuscript
NaNoWriMo Tip #28: No Fail Formula to Write Any Scene
Help! I'm Just Starting #NaNoWriMo! (Emergency Tip Day 4)
NaNoWriMo Tip #27: Get Back The Mood, Push to Finish!
Help! I'm Just Starting #NaNoWriMo! (Emergency Tip Day 3)
You’re right. This technique works every time. EVERY time. I’ve tried several times. Even with particular scenes and chapters, not just an entire plot. It works:)
Rule of three works because the basic pattern by which readers/listeners/viewers make sense out of anything is theme+variation, i.e. establish the “regular” or the “rule” and then vary or break it. Two is the minimum number to establish a pattern; then it only takes one to break it.
So the first traveling salesman sneaks down the hall to the farmer’s daughter and after he’s had his fun, sneaking back, he hears the old farmer cocking the shotgun, and goes, “Meow.”
“Oh,it’s just you, kitty.”
So the second etc. sneaks down the etc., etc.’s the farmer’s etc., hears the old farmer cocking the shotgun, and goes, “Meow.”
“Oh,it’s just you, kitty.”
So the 3rd (fill in blanks) hears the old farmer cocking the shotgun, and goes, “Don’t shoot, it’s the cat!”
The first thing the witches told MacBeth was something everyone already knew.
The second was something that everyone but him knew — he was about to find out.
So the theme=things you don’t have to be a witch to know, that are just automatically true anyway.
The third, though, was something that could only become true through his own efforts.
Variation: You still don’t need to be a witch to know it; you only need to be a traitor to make it happen.
So yeah, Rule of Three is a good rule. But Theme and Variation is better because you can do more variations (Lord Jim first doesn’t get into a boat when he should, then does when he shouldn’t, then finally does when he should — which makes his not getting into a boat when he shouldn’t the powerful climax. One theme, two variations.)
Leave a Reply: