Author Archives: Tara Maya
Author Archives: Tara Maya
Urm, I have some stuff I need to do for my blog. My blog won an award — squee! — but I haven’t nailed it to the wall yet. I want to catch up on a bunch of blogs I’m following, and I still want to post my thoughts on Endings, which is about half written. (My post on Endings has no ending. O, Irony, you kill me.)
Kids are off on Spring Break, I have a few art projects I’m going to bid on and Revenge of the Vomitous Stomach Flu has struck members of my clan again. However, I will brush up my blog eventually, and I apologize for the delay.
This interview with Arthur Golden, the author of Memoirs of a Geisha is ten years old, but new to me. A friend in a writing group passed the link to me, and I pass it on to you, with these thoughts:
1. This” overnight night success” took fifteen years to research, write, rewrite and sell.
2. Golden wrote a complete draft before he was able to interview a real geisha. “But I wrote a draft based on a lot of book-learning. And I thought I had a pretty good idea of what the world of a geisha was like, and wrote a draft. Then a chance came along to meet a geisha, which, of course, I couldn’t turn down. And she was so helpful to me that I realized I’d gotten everything wrong, and I ended up throwing out that entire first draft and doing the whole thing over again.”
3. He then rewrote the entire book again, this time changing from third person to first person.
And I also found this insight to the point:
O’BRIEN: What’s it like, sitting there at the computer keyboard, trying — as a white male, trying to put yourself into that skin?
GOLDEN: You know, I think that it’s pretty much like writing anything else in fiction, in the sense that even if you sit down and try to imagine a story about somebody who lives on a street you’ve never seen, you really can’t escape the hard work of just bridging this divide between you and an imagined other. And the difference for me was that I had to do a lot of research to put myself in a position where I could begin to know enough about that imagined other to make that leap. But the leap, I think, is the same, really, whatever kind of fiction you’re writing.
SunTiger tagged me with coming up with 3 ways to save money.
“There was a hand in the darkness and it held a knife.”
I became what I am today at the age of twelve, on a frigid overcast day in the winter of 1975. I remember the precise moment, crouching behind a crumbling mud wall, peeking into the ally near the frozen creek.
We all know, I presume, the importance of a good hook. Many of my friends who read this blog are familiar with Miss Snark’s First Victim’s Secret Agent contests, in which one has only 250 words to dangle that hook in front of an agent. She is presently running a first sentence contest, in which your hook must be in the very first sentence of your novel.
All well and good, but as I contemplate the best place to begin my Secret Novel, I would like to go beyond the obvious need for a hook and ask, “Yes, but what kind of hook?”
It isn’t enough to hook the readers in Chapter One and then throw them back into the lake of lukewarm plot tension for the rest of the book. The hook has to lead into the rest of the book.
It seems to me there are two ways the hook can do this: the Relay Race method or the Marathon Race Method.
* * *
In the Relay Race Method, the hook in the first chapter is not itself the main problem of the book. It is merely the first of a cascade of problems, each one leading to the next, so that tension in the story is passed along like a baton between different racers in a relay race.
For instance, imagine a Regency Romance in which the heroine finds a dead body on her lawn — and the hero standing beside it with a smoking gun. She thinks the hero is a murderer, and this is the first hook. By chapter 3, however, she has discovered the hero is not a murderer, but to protect him from going to prison, she pretends he spent the night in her bedroom. This alibi protects him but destroys her reputation, so they are forced to pretend they are engaged…. We may find out the true killer in chapter two and the dead body may matter no more to the story. It’s served its purpose in setting off the chain of problems which drive the plot.
* * *
In the Marathon Race Method, the Big Problem at the heart of the story’s conflict is the problem introduced right off the bat. The characters run and run after the solution, which doesn’t come until the end of the book. There are other problems, twists and turns on the road to the finish line, but they are all basically part of the same race.
For instance, imagine a similar story to the one above, but this time make it a Mystery. Now the question of who killed the dead man on the heroine’s lawn is the central question to be answered by the book. The heroine may still cease to suspect the hero by Chapter Three (perhaps prematurely) but the mystery must remain unsolved until the climax of the novel. In this version, the subplots of the heroine marrying the hero to give him an alibi/protect her reputation supplement her quest to find the murderer. (And who knows, maybe the rogue did do it!)
* * *
I know I need a hook for the beginning of my novel. But should it be a relay or a marathon?